Tuesday, February 5, 2013

2



Engels, as a German social scientistauthorpolitical theoristphilosopher, and father of Marxist-theory (The German Ideology, Marx and Engels, 1970) who commonly known as a "ruthless party tactician" devoted almost all his attention to the state of working-class neighborhoods. He takes the reader on a walking tour of the "great towns" with the intention of showing the reality of urban life, almost like a Dantesque tour of Inferno (Watch http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0368363/) or “Before Sunset” (2004, Watch http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0381681/).


-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Engels took his readers on a journey through the slums and ghettos of London. It was interesting how he began describing the beauty and greatness of the cities and how he dragged the audience down to “human turmoil”.
In one side, he saw no correlation between dwellers and in other side found them strongly tied (Like what Mark Granovetter argues in the “Strength of the Week Ties”, 1973)!
 He followed a sinus curve and made so many ups and downs to introduce readers to one of the most important aspects of the metropolitans; “Social Interactions”. Look at this;

“All human beings …same qualities and powers”
“They had nothing in common…”
“People with the same interest…”
“Nothing to do with one other”
“Individual are crowded together”
“The war of each against all”

In other words, Engels described the estrangement that afflicts the London 1840.

Wait ! Something do not change, I saw this city somewhere! New York City! Read the article again; change “London” by “New York City” and change “1840” by “2013”. Nothing’s really changed. You will see the same city’s gesture.

Jane Jacob (1916-2006) pursued the same school of thought as Engels (Symbolic Internationalism, George Herbert Mead). In her influential book (The Death and Life of Great American Cities, 1961), she introduced the sociological concept of “Social Capital” almost in the same way Engels did, and considered the city as a node of “social bargains”.





 Endnotes

-    The "Theories of Surplus Value" are contained in the Collected Works of Marx and Englels: Volumes 30, 31 and 32 (International Publishers: New York, 1988).
-   A copy of Frederick Engels' birth certificate is located on page 577 of the Collected Works of Karl Marx and Frederick Engels: Volume 2(New York: International Publishers, 1975).
-   Isaiah Berlin, Karl Marx: His Life and Environment p. 160
-   Frederick Engels' letter to Karl Marx contained in the "Collected Works of Karl Marx and Frederick Engels
-  The three part series of articles called The Condition of England is contained in the Collected Works of Karl Marx and Frederick Engels
-   Tucker, Robert C. The Marx-Engels Reader
-    Arts and Artisans at Home and Abroad, by J. C. Symons, Edinburgh, 1839. The author, as it seems, himself a Scotchman, is a Liberal, and consequently fanatically opposed to every independent movement of working-men. The passages here cited are to be found p. 116 et seq.–Note by Engels
-   Nassau W. Senior, Letters on the Factory Act to the Rt. Hon., the President of the Board of Trade (Chas. Poulett Thomson, Esq.), London, 1837, p. 24.– Note by Engels

Wednesday, January 30, 2013


Transportation is, in many ways, the most important segment of community’s infrastructure (R. Freilich) and a community’s transportation has a profound influence on its land use pattern and rate of growth. Ch. Zegrass believes transportation network is the “Shaper of the urban form” and argues that “no one can understand the urban development, unless know enough about the movements”.
In this “200 words report”, I am going to highlight the significance of TOD (as an “appreciable ridership bonus in U.S.”, R. Cervero) phenomena in suburbanized America.
What is the role of 1956 in sprawling the Americans? And how America’s suburbs impacted by Edsel Ford’?
What is the transportation investment impact on suburbanization and how transportation policies influenced by suburbanians?


------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Post war II era, could be called as golden years for America. Escalading GDP, low unemployment rates and peace. Then, U.S. immediately welcomed baby boomers, 800 $ Ford sedan and 18 cents/Gal fuel.
Cities expanded, inevitably. Cheap transportation and lands, expanded families and boomed middle class.
P. Muller called 1940s as “Freeway Era”. Those years was not sparked by a revolution in urban transportation. Rather, it represented the coming of age of the “Automobile Culture”(D.G. Janelle) which coincided with the lavish investment on freeways. Given impetus by 1956 interstate highways act, new suburbs flourished in every corner of urban America.
In less than three decades, in late 1970s suburbanians founded themselves trapped.
They had “Vehicle-depended mobility” with poor “independent accessibility” (J Moore).
 Mobility and accessibility are related, but analytically distinct and “complementary” concepts (J Dunn).
Then, they worked on accessibility. They started with high-density oriented land-use policies and mixed land use idea in 1980s, followed the density pattern by TOD in 90s and early 2000s and now are experiencing “poly-centric Metropolitans” (William T. Bogart).

What is the next?
Are suburban going to get absorbed in the main core of cities or they will agglomerate economy and attract more amenity, wealth and jobs?





Endnotes:



-      Cervero R, 2007, "Transit-oriented development’s ridership bonus: a product of self-selection and public policies" Environment and Planning A 39(9) 2068 – 2085 
-      The New Transit Town: Best Practices In Transit-Oriented Development, dited by Hank Dittmar, Gloria Ohland
-      California Department of Transportation; subconsultant to Cambridge Systematics on designing data base and evaluation of transit-oriented developments (TODs) in California, October 2000-June 2001.
-          Green TODs, International journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology, Vol 18, 2011
-          Are Suburban TOD overparker? Journal of Public Transportation, Vol 13, 2010
-          Suburbanization and Transit Oriented Development in China, Transportation Policy, Vl 15, 2008
-          Making Transit workin the Suburbs. TRR/TRB 1451, 1994
-          Suburban Employment Centers, Probing the Influence of Site Features On the Journey-to work. , Journal of Planning, 1989
-          Zegras. C. et al, Forthcoming by Commuting or Design? Age restricted neighborhoods. (Local Travel behaviors, Boston), Aug 2011
-      G Giuliano, “What Can We Really Achieve with Community Design Standards?” 
Conference on Urban Growth: Addressing the Reality of Suburbia, Drachman
Institute and Fannie Mae Foundation, Phoenix, AZ
-      Giuliano, G. (2005) “Low income, public transit and mobility,” Transportation Research Record 1927, 63-72.
-      The geography of urban transportation, S Hanson and G Giuliano
-      Jaek-Ik Kim, "The Suburbanization of Firms with Multiple  Labor Inputs:  From Monocentricity to Policentricity,"  School of Urban and Regional Planning, University of Southern California