Talking about
finance, geography, urban, ........just made me enthusiastic enough to do some
research and dedicate this week's topic into Geographic Equity Role in Public Transportation
policy.
The geography of urban transportation in U.S. cities is deeply formed by
the geography of urban transportation finance. And ‘financing/funding’ the
urban transportation (from where taxes are collected and to where they are
distributed) is managed by politicians, neither urban planners nor
transportation experts. To focus on how this funding decisions are made, it
should be necessary to draw a distinction between different distribution
concepts; Individual, Group and Geographic.
There are also hard debates over these
equity concepts and the logic of distribution methods. In one hand, Finance
scholars and activists are more interested on individual equity and group
equity. They argue that funds have to be distributed with the respect of the
number of ridership and patrons. In other hand, ‘Elected Officials’ are
concerned most with geographic equity. Taylor argues that the reason for
geography equity is that ‘representation in the United State is organized
geographically into a hierarchy of jurisdictions’. Consequently, geographic equity allocates public transit funding in equal among
jurisdictions, regardless how it is consumed or what the urbanized level of
state is. For example, the ridership of the New York Metropolitan Transit
Authority (N.Y.MTA.) is 900 times more than this number in Chapel Hill, NC but
the latter city enjoyed federal transit subsidies for 400 percent more than New
York for each trip!
========================================================================
Why
Geographic Equity Has a Role on Public Transportation Policy?
A-
Hierarchy of jurisdiction that is geographical
Representation
in congress and the majority of state legislatures matched the geographical
distribution of voters rather than urban transit client.
B
- Policy makers misunderstanding
Boxer (1998) argues that when announcing
federal funding of new transportation project to constitute, congress members
cite the economic benefits such projects will bring to the affected district.
He believes elected officials, were interested on capturing the federal funds
for transit projects for the economic revitalization and job creation in
depressed areas. Hence, transit funding by federal was pushed through
geographic equity that seemed more ‘Popular’ rather than other distribution
systems. Moreover, Taylors highlights the congress members reflect in summer
1998 to TEA-21 legislation and argues that they hailed TEA-21 as an engine for
continued economic growth by job generating.
C
- Public concern with worsening environment quality (started at 1970s),
Vanguard
strategy and anti auto activists (Dunn, 1998)
D
- The effect of transit investment on public
Taylor believes that transportation public works (notably, rail system)
are usually popular with voters and the people whom they elect. Because of this
reason, policy makers (and who need voters) are interested on geography equity.
Mark Garrett believes the combination of federal funds for transit and
dedicated local and state funding programs often produce politically powerful
action for transit, even in situations where it fails to satisfy either the
usual social equity or economic efficiency rationales.
========================================================================
1-
Hanson
and Giuliano, chapter 11
2-
American
public Transportation Association, 2003b
3-
Reconsidering
social equity in public transit, Garrett, Taylor
4-
Fiscal Equity in Urban Mass Transit
Systems: A Geographic AnalysisHodge
5- TRANSPORTATION
NEEDS AND EQUITY
6 - Evaluating
Transportation Equity, Guidance For Incorporating Distributional Impacts
in
Transportation Planning, Todd Litman
7-
Addressing Urban Transportation Equity in the United States
8-
Journal
article by Robert D. Bullard; Fordham Urban Law Journal, Vol. 31, 2004
9 -
Integrating geographic information
systems into transit ridership forecast models
10- A Coverage Model for Improving
Public Transit System Accessibility and Expanding Access



